Having slept on it, I've come up with no reason to change this viewpoint. But when you use the O-word, you get reaction, and some of it just isn't reasonable. Saying Memphis was overrated isn't the same thing as saying they weren't good. They were. Memphis was a good team that played a terrible game at a time of year when one terrible game ends your season.But they were overrated. They were a 2-seed. The 3-seeds were Villanova, Kansas, Syracuse and Missouri. Having watched the tournament so far, can you really believe Memphis was better than any of those teams? I might even have seeded 4-seed Xavier ahead of them, having watched the Musketeers nearly take out Pitt last night. So the point is, while the Tigers were one of the top 15 teams in the country heading into the tournament, they weren't one of the top eight. Hence, overrated. According to the actual meaning of the word.
As long as it can continue to replace it star freshman every year (does anybody really think Tyreke Evans is going to stay?), Memphis should keep finding itself in this position. Rolling into the tournament on a winning streak no one really knows how to evaluate. It wasn't just that Conference USA was weak this year. Memphis did what it could, scheduling Big East teams in December and teams like Tennessee and Gonzaga in the middle of their cotton-candy conference schedule. They did what they thought they had to do to toughen up and project legitimacy as an elite team.
But they weren't challenged, and therein lay the problem. Missouri answered the opening bell last night by punching Memphis in the mouth and knocking them down. And the Tigers, to whom such a thing had not happened since December, if all year, didn't know how to handle it.
Conversely, look at what Pitt did last night. They got beaten up in the first half by Xavier, went into the locker room and were able to say, "OK. They beat us up. We're behind. But we've been here before. We know what we need to do to come back." When Memphis got to the halftime locker room, the Tigers were in a position with which they were wholly unfamiliar. They didn't have anything in their playbook or memory banks that was going to help them come back from 13 down against the champions of the Big 12 tournament. (Even if those champions were going to play a rotten second half, miss all their free throws and do everything but engrave an invitation for Memphis to get back into the game.)
Nobody ever wins this tournament without overcoming something -- without playing at least one game that tests toughness. Memphis failed that test last night, and it's because nothing they did this year prepared them to handle it. All Memphis' schedule did was inflate its record artificially and push it into a two-seed when the Tigers really should have been a three or four.
That is the very definition of overrated.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-27-2009 @ 8:56AM
dtflchamps said...
Using your logic, no team was more badly over-rated than Duke. Oh yeah, how about the fact that Memphis went west and beat Gonzaga by 30 on their own court?
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 9:26AM
mellowreb1 said...
The point a lot of us are trying to make is your headline and whole story about that game was about Memphis!!!! Why not talk about the winning team and put their name in the headlines. A lot could have been said about the other Tigers (MIZZOU) you seem to have forgotten to mention they were there last night.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 9:52AM
Bitch said...
Memphis did play in the same conference last year, and did make it to the Championship. They challenged themselves as much as a team from C-USA could (and played a relatively challenging out of conference schedule). That's not inflating your record...that just the schedule they were allowed.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 11:04AM
maxprstud said...
Dan - Great article as usual. Your work in the Star-Ledger = Fantastic..
This is what happens to teams when they rarely get tested in the regular season. An early pink slip.....
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 12:12PM
tom said...
The idiots saying "they were in Conference USA last year and got to the Championship" are idiots. This is a completely different team from last year. I looked at Memphis and saw a team that fattened its record on teams like Tulsa and was closer in quality to a 3 or 4 seed than a 1. And to think they whined that they weren't a 1 seed.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 12:45PM
Welcome Don said...
I have said for three years that Memphis is the most over rated BB Team in college BB.
They play in the weakest of weakest conferences where 8 of this so called "conference" won less than half their games.
Memphis played just 6 teams in the top 50..... and lost to two of them.
Memphis played one top 25 ranked team and did beat them.
They have never been able to shoot free throws which their loss showed big time.
Over rated and over ranked is the best way to describe Memphis.
I bet they are looking forward to next season in the powerful Conference USA so they can go undefeated yet another year.
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!!!!!
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 5:54PM
lauraandgarrett said...
So what does Memphis need to do to convince skeptics? We play as tough a non league schedule as we can. CUSA did not keep us from 3 straight Elite 8's. It did not keep us from being 2 mins from a title in 2008. When can Memphis just get to the point when we're considered an elite team that loses at some point in the NCAA's just like every other team? If we didn't hold our seed 3 straight years (2006, 2007, and 2008) and almost did this year, fine, call us over-rated. But if we keep holding our seed, then we are NOT over-rated. We are rated just righted!!!
Reply
3-28-2009 @ 3:23PM
P J said...
Memphis has been overrated all year long . . for goodness sake, the best team other than Memphis in that ridiculous conference is TULSA!, and they are not good. It is high time that Memphis is out of the Dance . . . many think that they should not have been there at all, and certainly they should not have been seeded so highly. It is a far better tournament now that they are gone.
Reply
3-29-2009 @ 2:29PM
jsamuels84 said...
the part about missouri punching memphis in the mouth and memphis not knowing how to handle it is flat wrong in my opinion. memphis was down 13 at half and down 24 points at one point, only to battle back to cut the lead to 6.
in my opinion evaluation of the memphis team needs to somewhat fall on coach calipari. his reluctance to play anything but man defense (ok, occasionally a 3-2 junk zone for 3 possessions) is a sign of a coach being unwilling to change. throwing a 2-3 at missouri might have made all the difference in the world, as they showed against uconn that they aren't a good shooting team.
Reply